![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| << Business Time | Books: Gringos >> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How To Watch The Phantom Menace
(See also: How To Watch Attack of the Clones, How To Watch Revenge of the Sith.) No, I haven't seen Revenge Of The Sith yet. Stop asking. I had never intended to see it soon after it's opening, although I have resigned myself to the inevitability of seeing it in the theater eventually. Actually, I was kind of excited about it for a little while, but my enthusiasm seems to have peaked about a week ago, and my interest in the film has been dwindling ever since. So in an effort to rekindle the Star Wars flame -- or possibly snuff it out entirely -- I decided to rewatch The Phantom Menace. I wanted to reacquaint myself with the story, and this seemed the best way to do it -- even though, truth be told, I was dreading the screening. I'd seen The Phantom Menace twice before, and pretty much hated it both times. What I really wanted was an abridged version of the film, with just the plot and the cool scenes but none of the crap. Such a version is rumored to exist in the form of The Phantom Edit, but I had no idea how to secure a copy. The next best thing would have been a knowledgeable friend sitting next to me as I watched the DVD, telling me what stuff I should fast-forward through. Well, I'm that knowledeable friend now. If you foolishly decide to watch The Phantom Menace yourself, here's all the skippable stuff. I started compiling these fast-forwards with two objectives: to get the film under 90 minutes, and to eliminate as much Jar-Jar Binks as possible; halfway through the film I spontaneously added a third: to omit all the midichlorian flummery. (This might be a bad idea -- it's possible they play a role in Revenge of the Sith, though I'm guessing that, like Jar-Jar, Lucas is going to pretend like he'd never introduced them.)
Total time saved: 42:42 (although I'll admit that including the end credits in the time is kinda cheating). Conclusion: Rather to my surprise, The Phantom Menace was every bit as bad as I remembered. I thought that perhaps it had gotten worse in my memory, but, nope: it's full-on travesty. The saddest thing is that the first 10 minutes of the film are very promising, making minutes 11-138 all the more tragic, like spotting a $100 bill on the sidewalk, bending over to pick it up, and having a piano dropped on you. "Unlike you I am not an idiot and have no intention to rewatching Phantom Menace, so why don't you sum up?": You can find a very thorough summary here. In a nutshell, though, there are three main points:
Comments
Do this for Attack of the Clones. Please. You'll only have to watch like half an hour of film. Posted by: J.D. on June 11, 2005 3:45 PMNext Friday. Posted by: Matthew on June 11, 2005 3:54 PMBrilliantly done. As for your random revelation, you're very much so right on. As far as I can see it Anakin/Vader is the chosen one, not Luke like many people want to make it out to be. Vader is the only one who was a Jedi, fell completely to the dark side, and had enough power to come back to being a Jedi. Which of course is why it's absolutely ridiculous that they would CGI in Hayden Christiansen's figure into the end of David Prowse in the 'special edition' Posted by: Brent on June 11, 2005 4:49 PMI had always assumed that 'The Return of the Jedi' meant the return of the Jedi Order. Once the Emporer and Vader are defeated, the Jedi can come back in full force, seeing as the Jedi order was wiped out by Vader (as we learn from Obi-Wan in New Hope, so no spoilers there...) When you finally do drag your ass to see "Revenge of the Sith" you may be comforted by the fact that it's not nearly as bad as the first two in this wretched series of prequels. But it's still at times laughably bad. At least it's laughable, I guess. Not, like, WHAT THE FUCK HAVE YOU ASSHOLES DONE WITH MY CHILDHOOD sobbing, wailing awful. Laughably awful. Ha Ha! Posted by: Kate on June 11, 2005 5:00 PMTake into account that VI was originally called Revenge of the Jedi and then turned into Return of the Jedi once Lucas realized Jedis do not revenge-ify. Maybe it's Luke, maybe it's Vader. Who knows, but I still think it dealt with Luke. Posted by: mindsuckr on June 11, 2005 5:04 PMwell done... and the Phantom Edit is much better than the menace. Posted by: chzplz on June 11, 2005 5:45 PMI will not see the third movie unless and until Mr. George Asswipe Lucas releases the first three on DVD. What, you say he did? Nuh-uh, he released his horrible new versions of them. I want the first three back! Posted by: liz on June 11, 2005 8:33 PMDo yourself a favor, skip Sith. Or -- and this would just be cosmic justice -- wait until you can get some shaky-cam bootleg version so you can be absolutely sure Lucas does not reap one cent of profit off your pathetic fan-boy longing to see the "end" of the story. The most interesting thing about Phantom Edit, to me, would be if They made this kind of thing legal. Can you imagine if Lucas knew his version would have to compete in the free market against versions edited by people who, Oh I don't know, had an artistic vision? Posted by: on June 11, 2005 9:00 PMi never saw what was so noxious to everyone about jar jar? i would take like...an entire series of jar-jar binks only movies if they just removed little-kid anakin entirely from phantom menace. that movie would have been basically on par with episode III if they just scrapped anything to do with anakin, and replaced the lost run-time with more jedi ass-kicking, and possibly a yoda fight. if only /acting/ was as strong with anakin as the force was. choppa chowa! Posted by: zach. on June 11, 2005 10:51 PMExcellent! Posted by: Wayne on June 11, 2005 10:59 PMAfter reading, and enjoying, your Phantom analysis, I am eager to hear your thoughts on ep.3 when you get around to watching it. You could still cut out a lot of ep.3 and get the gist of it, but at least the movie, as a whole, doesn't suck. Posted by: jacob on June 11, 2005 11:20 PMI totally never thought about Vader being the returned Jedi....I think you have a valid point. Don't worry about the Clones....if you've seen one you've seen them all. Posted by: Michele on June 12, 2005 5:05 AMwow...perhaps the only thing more exhausting and numbing than watching TPM, is reading an encapsulation of all the sucky scenes. Posted by: aaron on June 12, 2005 6:54 AMWithout spoiling Sith for you, I'll mention that it turns out that Anakin's "immaculate conception" makes some sense after all. Listen closely during one discussion about the extremes of what the Force can be made to do. (If only certain other things had been explained. "Midichlorians? Ha! Clever prank on you, Qui-Gon played!") Posted by: Scott Hardie on June 12, 2005 7:56 AMHave you noticed that if you add the prefix "in" to Sith lords' names, you get meaningful english words, like Lord In-Sidious (the mastermind) and Lord In-Vader (he does a lot of that in episode 3) Posted by: alexei on June 12, 2005 12:49 PMI am always a little confused when people get all huffy about the prequels... Don't you realize how HORRIBLY AWFUL the originals were? Don't get me wrong -- they're great, classic, etc. I like 'em. BUT THEY ARE SO BAD. The acting is awful, the dialogue is awful, the effects are nice but that can't save them. The prequels are so right in line with the whole series -- bad, cheezy, and great to watch when you're folding laundry. Posted by: leen on June 12, 2005 3:16 PMi wanted to watch "attack of the clone" before seeing episode 3, but I couldn't find a copy in any video store i went to! can't wait to read your synopsis on friday! Posted by: Colin on June 12, 2005 4:13 PMNerd alert. Posted by: Mark on June 12, 2005 9:50 PM...Darth In-Maul? Darth In-Dooku? Good point though. It's sad that the most exciting lightsaber battle of all six movies was the one with Darth Maul at the end of TPM. As far as I'm concerned, Episode III is NOT worth watching. It's as bad, if not worse than the other prequels. And with prequel discussions, there are always those who say that the original was just as bad. I completely disagree with that. Look at the prequels, stilted storyline, acting, dialogue, unloveable and uninvolving characters, locations, heck, even the spaceships were pretty lame. Then looks at the originals. Coherent storyline that actually goes somewhere smoothly. Completely loveable characters with actually funny lines of dialogue. Chemistry between the characters. The acting really isn't bad at all. Especially compared to, say, Episode III for example where I experinced two and a half hours of pre-high school level performances. But, of course, in the end, it's a movie. Whether one likes it or not is obviously completely subjective. But, here is my subjective point of view: DON'T WATCH EPISODE III. IT IS SO BAD IT'S INSULTING. Posted by: Woot on June 13, 2005 3:00 AMAh, Matthew, I could have saved you the pain of having to watch "The Phantom Menace" altogether by loaning you my Weird Al Yankovic CD "Running With Scissors". The very first track is called "The Saga Begins" and is a recap of the entire movie in 5:27. And sung to the tune of "American Pie", no less. A long, long, time ago And we thought me and Qui Gon Jin But their response, it didn't thrill us. I haven't seen any of the new Star Wars movies, but my ex-husband told me that Weird Al pretty much nailed the plot. Posted by: C. on June 13, 2005 5:55 AMThank you, thank you, thank you. I was going to slit my wrists if I had to sit down and watch Jar-Jar again to get ready for Sith. After you do the short form of Clones, I'll be ready for what I hear is the best of the prequel trilogy. Of course,it's not hard to be the best of crap, and I have to wonder about calling a movie an anagram for sh*t... Posted by: Julie on June 13, 2005 8:22 AMAny movie that has a young boy - the main character - saying "Yippee!", *multiple* times, should be avoided. Heaven help us if it's a Star Wars movie. Posted by: Mark Hurst on June 13, 2005 8:31 AMThis was great! I also was going to request you do the same for the second film, but it seems like you've already promised. I'm looking forward to it. Posted by: Jenny on June 13, 2005 9:26 AMWith the exception of the pod race, this list of edits is pretty close to the Phantom Edit. What you're left with is a much tighter movie that uses the interactions of just a few characters to show that *both* the Senate and the Jedi Council are craven, hidebound institutions which are incapable of "covering their territory". Fortunately, the people who are slipping through the Jedi Council's loopholes are at least trying to maintain the spirit of their order, unlike the political machine wedging through the divisiveness of the Senate for its own ends. For me, this political story was completely buried under cutesiness. I only saw Clones once, so I don't have as good a grasp on it, but that shouldn't stop me from having a vehement opinion! First of all, I don't think it can be saved, because there's nothing that can fill the void created by cutting Yoda's swordfight. The choreography of that sequence is just wrong from beginning to end, but without it the arc of the movie is incomplete. Hopefully I haven't alienated everyone with that opinion, so here are my cuts that should be less controversial, as a starting point: 1. Trim up any shot that ends with a special effect. Lingering on Palpatine, just to watch the air car rush hour over his shoulder--gone. Any shot of a Kaminoan walking without anything else going on--gone. Savings: probably less than a minute, but it's critical to the pace. 2. Anakin is useless in reaction shots. Also, he never picks up his cues. Fortunately, these problems are solutions to each other--in any sequence of alternating one-shots, don't cut to his face until after he's started talking, then cut back away before he finishes. Then tighten up his audio track (lap it on to the previous and following shots) to match. Savings: could be as much as five minutes. 3. Cut everything on Tatooine. Keep everything about Anakin leaving and then rejoining Obi-Wan--just don't show it, and let Anakin's summary of what happened suffice. Savings: over 20 minutes, not counting lifting the psychic burden of having to witness the most unmoving death scene ever committed to film. Fire away! Posted by: Jon on June 13, 2005 12:23 PMJust re-watched Phantom Menace last week -- and oh how I wish I'd waited till you posted this! How could Jar-Jar be even worse than I remembered? And yet he was. I'll definitely wait and read your cuts for Clones before renting that. Posted by: Genevieve on June 13, 2005 1:50 PMSomething ten times more boring and pointless than the worst parts of whatever episode of Star Wars you want to get bored with: All the fucking twaddle being typed by the massed nerds of the intarwebs about what isn't good about any of the aforementioned six films. Next week on defective yeti: All the bits to miss in 'Earnest Gets a Vasectomy'. Because it is *that* important... Posted by: i_cola on June 13, 2005 4:54 PMdude. excellent. this is totally how I watch the movie. except I like the fish, the pod race, and the end battle, I'm a sucker for computer animation. but actually, I like the long run time, so instead of fast forwarding, I just pop into the other room and check my email, ebay auctions and whatnot. can you explain to me why they killed off darth maul, maybe the best sith ever? he could have been the darth vader of the new trilogy, but no, he went halfsies instead. Posted by: tom on June 13, 2005 8:21 PMIf it is so boring and pointless why sit and read it. Is your life so pitiful that you have had enough time to sit infront of your computer and read everything on the "intarwebs" that meets your standards and now have nothing better to do but read "all the fucking twaddle being typed by the massed nerds..."? Anyway, just a dissenting opinion here - I really enjoyed EP III and plan to go see it again. To each his own I guess. Posted by: Ken on June 13, 2005 8:36 PMKen: Two things... 1. I think all of the SW films are great. I'm in agreement with your "dissenting opinion". 2. How can you get it on with Barbie if you haven't got any genitals? Posted by: i_cola on June 13, 2005 11:25 PMI must insist that everyone go read this article now. I only wish I was talented enough to write like this! http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=episode3 My favourite quotation: "With Jar Jar's character no longer speaking to annoy you, Lucas filled the void by giving every robot in the movie stupid toy noises." Posted by: natasha on June 14, 2005 4:23 AMIt's funny how many people forget that Star Wars is and always was a KIDS movie series. The prequels really are on the same par as the original trilogy. Bad dialogue, crappy acting, cheesy humor, annoying characters - it's the same for every Star Wars movie. (Really - it is. Even for the original trilogy. Maybe we're just more forgiving for the original trilogy and don't always see it.) But when you're a kid that stuff works and that's how most of us saw the orignal movies - through the eyes of a child. George Lucas has a gift for creating movies and characters that kids love - even Jar Jar Binks. Yeah - Jar Jar is a favorite among kids - the real target audience of the movies. Crazy - huh? Revenge of the Sith is a little different though - it's target audience is a slightly older crowd - young adults. It's not a perfect movie but it's definitely my favorite of the six films. Posted by: tlinks on June 14, 2005 7:32 AMHA! I got the meaning of the title "Return of the Jedi" back in '83! Welcome to Cluesville. Oh, and I agree with everything you said about Phantom Menace. I half want to purchase video editing software and make my own Phantom Edit. Posted by: John B on June 14, 2005 11:21 AM"It's funny how many people forget that Star Wars is and always was a KIDS movie series." Because nothing says "kid's movie" like people being killed, maimed and dismembered by the dozens. Posted by: Keith on June 14, 2005 2:15 PMFirst, about the "Return of the Jedi", your observation is right on. Lucas said it himself, that the six episode series is the story of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader. It begins when he is nine years old, and ends with his death. This, incidentally, is why Lucas will never shoot episodes seven through nine: they aren't part of the story arc. Second, the story goes that Episode six was supposed to be "Revenge of the Jedi" and at about the same time, "Star Trek II: The Vengeance of Khan" was supposed to release. In a classic game of Hollywood chicken, both film titles were reworked to remove the resemblance. After changing the film title, the Lucas camp pulled that line about "Jedi don't stoop to the level of revenge", but the "Star Trek" people offered no explanation. Presumably, since Khan's "vengeance" was about as effective as the super-power of Captain Furious in "Mystery Men", it was downgraded to mere "wrath". Posted by: Matthew Makous on June 14, 2005 3:26 PM"2. How can you get it on with Barbie if you haven't got any genitals?" Can you say dry hump? Didn't you wonder why we never had any children? Posted by: Ken on June 14, 2005 9:30 PMOh, thank you thank you thank you. I was so traumatized by Phantom Menace that I could never bring myself to see Attack of the Clones. I toyed with the idea of seeing Sith, but only "if somebody would provide me with an abridged version of the first two movies -- just the important stuff." And I was really wishing that I could somehow see the abridged form, not just read it. With your handy-dandy guide I can get myself up to speed. Although, I have started to entertain second thoughts about going to see Sith. Maybe you could do the same for Sith when it comes out on DVD, and I could watch the whole 'trilogy' in under 3 hours?! (And don't get me started on the ridiculous idea that children's films must suck because children are simpleminded. Eh...it's not even worth engaging. Nevermind.) Posted by: Niki on June 15, 2005 12:29 PM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||