![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| << The Bad Review Revue | Photodissolution >> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How To Watch Attack Of The Clones
(See also: How To Watch The Phantom Menace, How To Watch Revenge of the Sith.) The general consensus is that Attack of the Clones, while not great, is much better than The Phantom Menace, though I've heard a few people express the opposite opinion. I think it basically comes down to one question: what do you find more excruciatingly unwatchable, Jar-Jar's slapstick or the Anakin / Amidala romance? Me, I found the latter much more forgivable, thanks to something a reviewer once wrote about Titanic: while he conceded that the romantic dialogue in Titanic was atrocious, he pointed out that it was also a fairly accurate depiction of how young people in love actually talk, i.e., maudlin, dramatic, and as cliched as all get-out. I don't think for a moment that Lucas wrote lines like "you are in my very soul, tormenting me" because he was trying to emulate what 16 year-olds say when they are trying to convey the sentiment "holy shit, being a virgin sucks!" but if you pretend like that was Lucas' intent the film is much more bearable. That said, skipping all the love scenes detracts not at all from the movie -- we didn't need to see the nitty-gritty of Han and Leia falling in love to know it was happening -- so feel free to do so. Here, then, is the cheat-sheet for fast-forwarding through Attack of the Clones. As with the previous guide, this is intended for folks who have already seen the film and are only interested in refreshing their memories about the plot in anticipation of Revenge of the Sith. Again, my goal was to get the film down to about 90 minutes and to axe anything that wasn't integral to the story. I've also included tips on removing much of the love story, for those who can't abide it.
Total time saved: 41:21 Analysis: I so loathed Phantom Menace that I swore I wouldn't see Clones in the theater, but when my in-laws hornswoggled me into going I was surprised by how much I liked it. It's mediocre to be sure, but mediocre is still one infinity better than Episode I (though I realize that "better than The Phantom Menace" is damning with the faintest of praise, like saying "more delicious than echinacea!"). Watching it again on DVD gave me a glimmer of hope that Revenge of the Sith may be as good as some are claiming. Some have claimed that the But the big big problem with this whole trilogy is that I don't give a rat's ass about any of the protagonists. The Jedi -- Obi Wan, Qui-Gon, Yoda -- are too noble to be endearing; Anakin is a rageaholic jerk; Amidala isn't even much of a character, just the obligatory catalyst for Anakin's lovelorn dramatics. Furthermore, these first two movies aren't even about these people -- they are about Darth Sidious and his subtle machinations to seize power. This is in sharp contrast to episodes 4-6, which really were about the heroes: Luke, Han, Leia -- even Chewbacca felt like your buddy by the end of it all. I wouldn't want to go for beers and pinball with anyone in Phantom or Clones, except for Anakin's mom who was kinda hot until the Tusken Raiders got to her. Lastly, I'd just like to say that Ewan McGregor's impersonation of Sir Alec Guinness is just shy of miraculous, and almost makes up for the fact that all the other acting sucks. Plot Points For The People Too Smart To Rewatch This: Again, a complete summary of the film can be found at sf-worlds.com. But for those who just want the highlights:
Random Revelation: Hmm, an angst-ridden young man learning to cope with his extraordinary powers and being tempted by the Dark Side? The novelization of this movie should be called Harry Potter And The Order of the Jedi. Posted on June 17, 2005 to MoviesComments
Actually, for The Phantom Menace, a good listen to Weird Al's "The Saga Begins" would've been all you needed to do to reacquaint yourself with the plot. Posted by: Mike on June 18, 2005 10:26 PMOf course, belatedly, I thought, "Maybe I should've looked at the other article's comments first to see if someone else already suggested this." Heh. Posted by: Mike on June 18, 2005 10:31 PMSet your expectations to 'low' and you won't be disappointed by Sith. While definitely a cut above the other 2 prequels, it still suffers from wooden dialogue / 12-year-old 'romantic' interactions / overuse of CGI. It's frustrating to think of the movie it could have been, had it been turned over to a competent director / screenwriter per Empire and Jedi. I had no feelings for any of the characters save Anakin at times; his transition to the dark side is handled well in the first half but turns into repeated rubber-mallet-pounding in the second. Overall not bad, but it could have been so much better. Posted by: psorr on June 18, 2005 10:45 PMLucas couldn't go lower than what he did in Phantom Menace, so this one ranked slightly higher on my scale. Lucas has tried to justify his writing deficiencies by saying that a story should be moved along effectively by its events and not by dialogue. That's warning enough of cheesy love scenes - I was ready for them. The most disappointing part of Clones for me was watching Yoda with a lightsaber. It was excrucatingly awful, but merely a prelude to what we see in Sith, in which not only Yoda, but Anakin and Kenobi get all crazy with force powers. It's nutty, and not in a good way. Posted by: J.D. on June 19, 2005 9:08 AMWhat the hell is ecanata? Posted by: Carny Asada on June 19, 2005 6:25 PMDude, Sith sucked. Posted by: Fin on June 20, 2005 6:24 AM"The Jedi Council's mastery of the Force is fading, and they sense that the Dark Lord of the Sith is controlling much of the Republic's Senate. The council is unable to divine the Dark Lord's identity or goals, though, as the Dark Side clouds their vision." Also worth noting is that Dooku TELLS OBI-WAN THE PLOT, and Obi-Wan TELLS IT TO YODA and they both just shrug it away. Posted by: Dave Lartigue on June 20, 2005 6:45 AMThere's one missing step in your guide to watching Attack of the Clones. I generaly refer to this step as the "smash your nuts in a drawer to take your mind off the excruciating agony of the film" part. Posted by: Walt on June 20, 2005 7:23 AMOne other critical element is missed in the second to last fast-forward: Amidala's abs are made of Teflon. That's why the gi-normous talons of the cat thinger conveniently destroy her tightie-whitie battle skin suit without scarring Natalie Portman's skin. These abs go to Harvard. Posted by: JPed on June 20, 2005 7:48 AMOh, ECHINACEA, not ecanata. Hah! Very funny. Carry on. Posted by: Carny Asada on June 20, 2005 8:44 AMI enthusiastically agree about MacGregor's perfomance being perfectly aligned with Sir Alec's. Since you mentioned novelizations, I want to say the the book version of Sith is much better than the movie. For one thing, Padme is a real character with motivation and depth. Anakin's changes are also much more believable and motivated. It would be overly generous to call the movie a Cliff Notes version of the novel, although I can't come up with a better comparison at the moment. Posted by: ch on June 20, 2005 10:46 AMIn an article by Neal Stephenson I found the analogy I wanted. The movie of Sith is a Power Point version of the book. Posted by: ch on June 21, 2005 9:09 AMKids' films? Well, yeah, but that's as general as saying vintage Bugs Bunnys are "kid's cartoons." I've said it before: I think the key to the "new" episodes' badness is that the actors are not playing adult roles; they are acting to the level of Saturday morning cartoons, with none of the depth/extra dimension of the originals. Han Solo shot first. Posted by: JP on June 21, 2005 9:10 AMWhat about the bit where Obi-Wan appears to go into a New York diner? - How bad is that? Posted by: psychbloke on June 22, 2005 2:50 PM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||