<< Atonal | Snopes Isn't Even Trying Anymore >>
Movies: Rocky Balboa

When it was released to theaters last year, Rocky Balboa received generally favorable reviews, but even the kindest critic said it was pretty much a film for completists. If you've seen Rocky II, Rocky III, Rocky IV, and Rocky V (yes, there was a Rocky V), they said, you may as well go whole hog and see this one too.

Up until two years ago, I'd never seen any of the Rocky films. But I'd always been perplexed by the fact that the first had won the "Best Picture" academy award. Seriously? Rocky? It's just a dumb guy boxing, right? As far as I knew, it was the stereotypical (or perhaps prototypical) "sports film"--lovable underdog with a lot of heart works really hard, experiences setbacks, overcomes obstacles, and, against all odds, wins in the end. Plus, it was written by Sylvester Stallone--how good could it possibly be?

The answer, I discovered when my curiosity got the better of me and I finally rented the thing, was: pretty goddamned good! It was not the slick and generic sports films I'd expected, based on what little I'd seen of Rocky III and IV. Instead, it was melancholy, gritty, and authentic through and through, as much about the means streets of Philadelphia as about the titular character.

Enjoying Rocky did not increase my desire to see the sequels. If anything, it encouraged me to steer clear. I had no desire to see the Hollywood Blockbuster I'd expected the first to be.

Flash-forward to last week when, for some inexplicable reason, I added Rocky Balboa to my Netflix queue and sent it to position #1. Frankly, I was just interested to see what convoluted rationale they'd use to justify a 60-year-old Stallone re-entry to the ring.

Imagine my incredulity when, for the second time, the Rocky film I'd been prepared to mock turned out to be not bad.

Rocky Balboa is written like a direct sequel to the original film, not as the sixth in a series. The events of Rocky II-V happened, but are mentioned only in passing. All you know (or need to know) is that, at some point after the events of the first film, Rocky won the title of Heavyweight Champion, held it for some time, and has long since retired from the ring. Though Rocky's home is much larger than the amazingly tiny apartment he lived in for the first film, he is still a humble and modest guy, still resides in Philly, and still has Paulie as a best friend. Furthermore, the cinematography of the film is much closer to the rough-hewn Rocky than that of its polished predecessors.

Which isn't to say that Balboa clears the high bar set by Rocky. There's a lot of speechifying in this film, which mainly consists of characters shoring up one another's sagging morale with rousing motivational speeches. The film occasional wanders over the line separating "paying homage to" and "just remaking" scenes from the original film--and routinely barrels across the line between "sentimental" and "schmaltz". And Rocky's son simply doesn't work: the actor's not that great, the character is ill-defined, and he comes across as little more than a plot element Stallone felt obliged to include since he'd existed in some of the prior movies. (Perhaps in recognition of this fact, Rocky essentially adopts a new son a third of the way into the film. And a dog.)

Still, watching Rocky and Rocky Balboa as I did, with a few years separating the screenings, was very satisfying. I bet it would be even more so if you saw Rocky back in the 70's or 80's, and didn't bother with any of the sequels. It reminded me of the Before Sunrise / Before Sunset duology, with thirty years elapsing between the two films instead of 10, and the romance between a boxer and the Heavyweight championship title. (Cinephiles who bristle at the comparison are probably forgetting that the original Rocky had at least as much indie cred as Linklater's film--perhaps more, as at least Ethan Hawke was a bankable star at the time of Sunrise's release).

I wouldn't recommend Rocky Balboa to everyone. But if you enjoyed the first, and were always more interested in the Rocky the character than in Rocky the franchise, you'll probably be as pleasantly surprised by the final chapter as I was.

Posted on August 24, 2007 to Movies


My wife was incredulous when I told her I had never seen any of the Rocky films. We added them all to our queue and slogged through the whole of the six. One is stellar, I was similarly surprised when I saw it. Two was alright, a decent sequel. Three was full of 80s and sports movie cliches (perhaps it was the birth of them), camp, and a surprising amount of (probably unintentional) homoeroticism. Four and Five were formulaic crap. But I had seen Rocky Balboa once before seeing the whole set, and after watching 1-5, number 6 took on a little more weight.

Having seen all the movies, I could recognize the locations and stuff in the background, and I imagined that I knew what Rocky was reminiscing about. But more than that was the revelation of Rocky 5: Rocky had brain damage. Though in the first film Rocky was not the brightest crayon in the box, he was an uneducated tough, not a dimwit. He becomes more erudite as the series progresses, but at the beginning of #5, he is diagnosed with brain damage (in what is probably meant to be a so-he'll-never-fight-again-style setup) and it shows up in Rocky Balboa. His son's reactions to him are filtered through his knowledge of his father as a retired boxer and city hero who isn't running with all cylinders firing. Paulie also looks at Rocky this way, knowing his best friend's mind is fading. This revelation colors the movie differently, for me.

Posted by: Ryan R on August 27, 2007 3:46 PM

I agree, with the notable exception that the editors went all Sin-city nutso during the fight scenes.

"Ima hit you so hard, your chroma-key will bleed!"

Posted by: halcyon on August 27, 2007 6:02 PM

thank you for not recommending this.

Posted by: mister anchovy on August 27, 2007 6:09 PM

You may have a similar experience with the first Rambo movie (First Blood), waaay better than the sequels, but a surprisingly good film. I don't think you'd have the same experience with the last sequel to it, though, and should just avoid anything after the first one.

Rather like the Highlander movies, in fact (okay, I liked the series). Definitely get the extended Higherlander DVD if you haven't yet - some deleted scenes that explain a lot.

Posted by: Tumbleweed on August 27, 2007 10:50 PM

I think Rocky II is worth seeing, mostly as a double-header with Rocky I. If you share my interest in identifying later-successful actors in minor roles, note that 'Chickie,' the bully in Rocky V, is Eric from Entourage.

Posted by: Philip flip Kromer on August 28, 2007 7:16 AM

Tumbleweed: there's another Rambo coming out too, called John Rambo. From what I understand, Sly is trying to take it in a similar direction to Rocky Balboa. But we'll see how it ends up.

I didn't mind his son so much, really - but then, maybe I was swayed a bit because I had just watched like 15 episodes of Heroes before the flight on which I saw Rocky Balboa, so I was all "OMG! Peter Petrelli is in this! Awesome!"

Posted by: Ryan Waddell on August 28, 2007 7:52 AM

Rocky IV is worth watching for the epic and ridiculous training sequences. The Cold War-era cheesiness is hilarious.

Posted by: Julia on August 28, 2007 8:58 AM

Hell yes. Nearly one of the best movies of 2006, actually! (C'mon, there's a dog named Punchy!)

Posted by: Choire on August 28, 2007 2:53 PM

Here's a movie I'd pay to see:

Rocky Balboa vs. Ethan Hawke's character from "Reality Bites."

Or even better: "Random Character Actors from the 70s and 80s Take Turns Punching Ethan Hawke in the Face." Brett Ratner could direct.

Posted by: Karl on August 28, 2007 4:02 PM

Sweet hominy, Karl: I would pay any amount of money to see that.

Posted by: Eamon on August 29, 2007 8:02 AM

I was born in Philly and raised in its suburbs, and now I live in Austin, TX. I liked Rocky fine growing up, but ever since I moved it has become a fave, because it is just as much about the city as it is about Rocky. Philadelphia, the underdog city that just can't get love - the dirty, gorgeous architecture, the attitude that comes across as rude but is actually a perverted form of friendliness. You just can't get that shit down South.

Posted by: dregina on August 29, 2007 9:07 AM

Face it. The man is a genius.

Who else could make the same movie over and over again and make them successful each time? He's done it with both the Rocky and Rambo franchises.

He may seem like an idiot but he definitely gets the last laugh.

Posted by: skate on August 29, 2007 10:48 AM